Home Overview FAQ Documentation Download Mailing List Geomview For Windows? Support Users Development Bug Reporting Contributing Contact Us Sponsors
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] geomview 1.1
To answer one of your questions: >Is there anyway to normalize a group of objects the same way, or perhaps >in a collection of objects, have all objects normalized the same way as >the first object loaded? Currently, we have three objects - each color >coded. We are not using any normalization because we want two of them >imposed upon the other. The problem that occurs with this approach is >that it makes it extremely difficult to rotate the three objects >together to get the perspective we need. Do you want to make a single combined object out of the three separate objects you have right now? It would solve the normalization and rotation problems referred to above. However, once you make a combined object you lose the ability to interactively manipulate the sub-parts. Often this is not desirable, but your message sounded like perhaps this would be preferable for you. There are two hierarchical file types, LIST and INST. A LIST is just a collection of other objects; i.e. if you have files foo.quad, bar.mesh, and bat.vect, you can combine them in the file all.list as follows: { LIST { < foo.quad } { < bar.quad } { < bat.mesh } } If you want to specify positions for each of your separate objects, you can make them into INST and then make a LIST from the three INSTs. Here's an example where foo.quad and bar.quad are superimposed. { LIST { INST unit < foo.quad transform 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 } { INST unit < bar.quad transform 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 } { INST unit < bat.mesh transform 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 } }
|
||
Home | Overview | FAQ | Documentation | Support | Download | Mailing List Windows? | Development | Bug Reporting | Contributing | Contact Us | Sponsors |
|||
site hosted by |