Re: [Update REQ 6116]: Comments on your Software

[richard at cubicsci.com]

To: software@geom.umn.edu
Subject: Re: [Update REQ 6116]: Comments on your Software

daemon at geom.umn.edu wrote:
> 
> From: Mark Phillips <mbp>
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 14:52:30 -0600
> Message-Id: <199702182052.OAA03796 at delaunay.geom.umn.edu>
> To: software@geom.umn.edu
> Subject: Re: [ REQ 6116]: Comments on your Software
> 
> > Is it be possible to license geomview package to be
> > ported to windows-based environment?  The ported
> > version will be packaged for commercial sales.
> 
> We're in the process of developing a Windows version ourselves, and
> are talking to our University lawyers about licensing options.  We
> haven't working out anything definite yet.
> 
> I'm curious what you had in mind.  In particular, were you interested
> in doing the port yourself, or in having us do it?
> 
> Mark Phillips
> Geometry Center
> mbp at geom.umn.edu
> 

My previous email to you was in response to a question in the "FAQ"
file.  The response to that question was that your organization does not
have enough resources to port geoview to Microsoft windows and Macintosh
platforms.  My company is interested in seen geoview on the Microsoft's
windows because we can integrate it with curriculum-based educational
software that we are developing for commercial release.  This is the
reason why we wanted to license geoview and port it, ourselves, to
windows-based environment.  If goeview is being ported to windows-based
environment that is is very good.

We will still be interested in obtaining a license to geoview so that we
can integrate it with our products.  Please keep us on mailing list
regarding your progress and when the ported version will be available
for release.  We will be willing to participate in beta testing of the
ported version.

Thank for your response.

Richard Oyekan
Calscience
richard at cubicsci.com